<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ideas for html5gallery</title> <atom:link href="http://html5gallery.com/ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://html5gallery.com</link> <description>A showcase of sites using HTML5 markup</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 01:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Richard Clark</title><link>http://html5gallery.com/ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-24957</link> <dc:creator>Richard Clark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:31:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://html5gallery.com/?page_id=165#comment-24957</guid> <description>Thanks Erik, yeah I noticed that the other day but then checked on another machine &amp; it seemed ok so thought I was going crazy! Updated to a transparent logo now though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Erik, yeah I noticed that the other day but then checked on another machine &#038; it seemed ok so thought I was going crazy! Updated to a transparent logo now though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Erik Woods</title><link>http://html5gallery.com/ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-24956</link> <dc:creator>Erik Woods</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:30:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://html5gallery.com/?page_id=165#comment-24956</guid> <description>Love the site. Love the updated look.
But did you know that your header image (http://html5gallery.com/wp-content/themes/html5gallery2/images/logo.png) has a different background color than header[role=&quot;banner&quot;] behind it?
Not sure if it is intentional, but I&#039;m assuming that it is not, since it is so subtle. You might need to convert that png to a transparent one or re-save with a different color profile.
Please correct me if I&#039;m wrong - I won&#039;t take offense. I come across this problem every once in a while, too and usually using a different profile helps.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the site. Love the updated look.</p><p>But did you know that your header image (<a
href="http://html5gallery.com/wp-content/themes/html5gallery2/images/logo.png" rel="nofollow">http://html5gallery.com/wp-content/themes/html5gallery2/images/logo.png</a>) has a different background color than header[role="banner"] behind it?</p><p>Not sure if it is intentional, but I&#8217;m assuming that it is not, since it is so subtle. You might need to convert that png to a transparent one or re-save with a different color profile.</p><p>Please correct me if I&#8217;m wrong &#8211; I won&#8217;t take offense. I come across this problem every once in a while, too and usually using a different profile helps.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://html5gallery.com/ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-21485</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 05:55:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://html5gallery.com/?page_id=165#comment-21485</guid> <description>Great site guys, thanks for the share. It&#039;s good to see what other people are doing with HTML5 Such an exciting move for web designers ! Hooray for HTML5 !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site guys, thanks for the share. It&#8217;s good to see what other people are doing with HTML5 Such an exciting move for web designers ! Hooray for HTML5 !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paulo Marques</title><link>http://html5gallery.com/ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-3759</link> <dc:creator>Paulo Marques</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:29:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://html5gallery.com/?page_id=165#comment-3759</guid> <description>First, i think that&#039;s a good idea, but the criterious to submit a page are a litle irrelevant.
I see some codes an they have i little of html5, not the entire development of the content.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, i think that&#8217;s a good idea, but the criterious to submit a page are a litle irrelevant.</p><p>I see some codes an they have i little of html5, not the entire development of the content.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Walsh</title><link>http://html5gallery.com/ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-2841</link> <dc:creator>Dan Walsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:34:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://html5gallery.com/?page_id=165#comment-2841</guid> <description>Yep, thanks for the reply.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, thanks for the reply.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard Clark</title><link>http://html5gallery.com/ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-2770</link> <dc:creator>Richard Clark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://html5gallery.com/?page_id=165#comment-2770</guid> <description>@Art, we&#039;re going to be looking at a (long overdue) redesign and rebrand in the new year so a ratings filter is something that we&#039;ll look into.
The option to filter by category or tag already exists; just click on them!
@Dan, you&#039;re right there is a long wait at the moment, we do have four of us curating the site and posting as much as we can. As I&#039;m sure you can appreciate we all do this when spare time allows which isn&#039;t always easy with families etc.
We&#039;ve also purposefully decided not to make the process automated to ensure each site gets valuable critique. We&#039;re currently processing some sites that were submitted in September. You&#039;re right a time indication is probably a good idea for something to add.
I did used to email folks make when their site was rejected but this no longer happens because of time. I also found that no-one tended to reply with &quot;ok, I understand, I&#039;ll improve it&quot; rather they didn&#039;t reply at all.
Hopefully that addresses your concerns.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Art, we&#8217;re going to be looking at a (long overdue) redesign and rebrand in the new year so a ratings filter is something that we&#8217;ll look into.</p><p>The option to filter by category or tag already exists; just click on them!</p><p>@Dan, you&#8217;re right there is a long wait at the moment, we do have four of us curating the site and posting as much as we can. As I&#8217;m sure you can appreciate we all do this when spare time allows which isn&#8217;t always easy with families etc.</p><p>We&#8217;ve also purposefully decided not to make the process automated to ensure each site gets valuable critique. We&#8217;re currently processing some sites that were submitted in September. You&#8217;re right a time indication is probably a good idea for something to add.</p><p>I did used to email folks make when their site was rejected but this no longer happens because of time. I also found that no-one tended to reply with &#8220;ok, I understand, I&#8217;ll improve it&#8221; rather they didn&#8217;t reply at all.</p><p>Hopefully that addresses your concerns.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Walsh</title><link>http://html5gallery.com/ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-2768</link> <dc:creator>Dan Walsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:55:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://html5gallery.com/?page_id=165#comment-2768</guid> <description>This isn&#039;t intended to be a rant/sour grapes so I hope it doesn&#039;t come across that way but...I submitted my site quite a while ago and check back every day to see if it&#039;s been listed.  When I find it hasn&#039;t I shrug my shoulders and think &#039;Oh well, try again tomorrow&#039;.  Call me impatient  but what would be useful is an estimated time of listing - assuming my site is worthy of being listed, of course!
Also, if a site is submitted and fails to be listed perhaps an indication of why it wasn&#039;t listed would be helpful.  Although I apreciate you may not have the time to provide this type of feedback.
Anyway, that&#039;s my tuppence worth.  Overall, it&#039;s a great site, it&#039;s been a real help to me and really inspiring so thank you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t intended to be a rant/sour grapes so I hope it doesn&#8217;t come across that way but&#8230;I submitted my site quite a while ago and check back every day to see if it&#8217;s been listed.  When I find it hasn&#8217;t I shrug my shoulders and think &#8216;Oh well, try again tomorrow&#8217;.  Call me impatient  but what would be useful is an estimated time of listing &#8211; assuming my site is worthy of being listed, of course!</p><p>Also, if a site is submitted and fails to be listed perhaps an indication of why it wasn&#8217;t listed would be helpful.  Although I apreciate you may not have the time to provide this type of feedback.</p><p>Anyway, that&#8217;s my tuppence worth.  Overall, it&#8217;s a great site, it&#8217;s been a real help to me and really inspiring so thank you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art_Hell</title><link>http://html5gallery.com/ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-2744</link> <dc:creator>Art_Hell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:04:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://html5gallery.com/?page_id=165#comment-2744</guid> <description>I like the idea of the search or filter on ratings.  However, I would say have another rating for code.  Combined scoring filters the &quot;Champs&quot;.  Where I have little to no experience or talent with the code I would NOT rate anyone.  However someone that liked the code and knew it well enough to rate it might enlighten me on code that is truly exceptional.  Additionally consider the the option to filter on the class or descriptor Agency, Blog, Agency, or Education.
There by allow a novice, as I am, to filter a few good examples of the type I am looking for so I might actually make a decent page.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of the search or filter on ratings.  However, I would say have another rating for code.  Combined scoring filters the &#8220;Champs&#8221;.  Where I have little to no experience or talent with the code I would NOT rate anyone.  However someone that liked the code and knew it well enough to rate it might enlighten me on code that is truly exceptional.  Additionally consider the the option to filter on the class or descriptor Agency, Blog, Agency, or Education.</p><p>There by allow a novice, as I am, to filter a few good examples of the type I am looking for so I might actually make a decent page.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard Clark</title><link>http://html5gallery.com/ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-2341</link> <dc:creator>Richard Clark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:10:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://html5gallery.com/?page_id=165#comment-2341</guid> <description>@ksrich - Searching by ratings is a good idea and something that we&#039;ll look into, the problem is lots of folk only vote on the visual not on the best code which needs some further thinking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ksrich &#8211; Searching by ratings is a good idea and something that we&#8217;ll look into, the problem is lots of folk only vote on the visual not on the best code which needs some further thinking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ksrich</title><link>http://html5gallery.com/ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-2293</link> <dc:creator>Ksrich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:41:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://html5gallery.com/?page_id=165#comment-2293</guid> <description>I personally like the ratings, but wish there was a way to search by rating to see who has the best code, rather than look through everyone.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like the ratings, but wish there was a way to search by rating to see who has the best code, rather than look through everyone.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
